Microsoft word - eval brief - meds - mar08.doc
Medication Use Among Children and Youth Entering the Albany County System of Care
LuAnn L. McCormick, PhD, MSW and Kenneth B. Robin, PsyD
Center for Human Services Research, University at Albany, State University of New York
The use of medication to treat children’s mental health disorders has increased over the past several decades. There is
debate in the field whether this reflects a true increase in the frequency with which medications are prescribed for
children, or is a result of an increase in the number of children diagnosed with mental health disorders requiring
medication. Concerns also abound regarding over-medicating children and prescribing medications without sufficient
research trials on children. This evaluation brief presents our preliminary analysis of medication use by children enrolled
in the Albany County, NY system of care, and determines relationships between medication use and age, gender,
race/ethnicity, and diagnosis. Whether medications are used as part of an overall coordinated service plan is also
explored. Data Sources
Data for this analysis are derived from intake forms and baseline and follow-up caregiver interviews. The Enrollment and
Demographic Information Form (EDIF) is completed during intake and provides demographic information as well as
presenting problems and diagnoses. The Caregiver Information Questionnaire (CIQ) is administered to adult caregivers
during baseline and all follow-up interviews. Caregivers are asked whether their child has taken medications for his/her
emotional and behavioral problems during the preceding 6 months, and if so, to specify the name of the medication(s).
The Multi-Sector Services Contacts (MSSC) is administered starting at the 6-month follow-up interview and collects
detailed information on services received. The dataset used in this analysis contains 161 baseline and 87 6-month follow-
up cases. Findings
Nearly two-thirds (N=100, 62%) of youth enrolled in the longitudinal evaluation are taking medications for emotional or
behavioral issues at baseline. This is higher than SAMHSA’s national evaluation findings of 47%. Nearly equal
proportions of boys and girls take medications, 66% and 61%, respectively. Similarly, there are no significant differences
in racial categories: 67% of African American or biracial youth and 63% of White youth enrolled at baseline are taking
medications (13 cases do not have race indicated). Elementary age children (5-12) receive medication as frequently as
youth age 13-21 (69% and 67%, respectively). No child under age 5 is taking medication. In terms of caregiver
characteristics, we have found that children of caregivers with some post-high school education are more likely to be
taking medication, but household income did not significantly impact medication use. Among children with private
insurance, 73% are taking medications compared to 68% for children with Medicaid or Child Health Plus.
Table 1. Medication Use by Diagnostic Category
Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders (ADHD)
Psychological response to stressor(s) Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Symptoms related to exposure to extreme trauma Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)
**NOT A FINAL ANALYSIS – DATA COLLECTION IS CONTINUING**
The diagnoses listed in Table 1 are the five most common diagnostic categories among children in the sample, with Mood
Disorders (depression and bipolar) being the most common diagnostic category among children who take medications. Of
course, children can have more than one diagnosis, or “co-occurring disorders”, for example Mood Disorder and ADHD.
Having more than one mental health diagnosis is related to medication use, but this could also be a function of which
diagnoses tend to stand alone. For example, children with Adjustment Disorder are least likely to have a co-occurring
disorder and least likely to use medications, whereas children with Mood Disorders are more likely to have a co-occurring
disorder and to be taking medications. Drug Categories
There are six primary drug categories for the range of medications prescribed for children: antipsychotics, antidepressants,
anxiolytics (anti-anxiety), mood stabilizers, noradrenergics (to offset side effects), and stimulants (primarily for ADD/
Table 2. Frequency of Medication Use by Drug Category
Abilify, Haldol, Orap, Risperdal, Seroquel, Zyprexa
Carbamazepine (Tegretol), Depakote, Limictal, Lithium,
Neurontin, Trileptol, Topiramate (Topamax)
Celexa, Desyrel, Effexor, Lexapro, Paxil, Prozac, Strattera,
* This category of medications is typically used for ADD/ADHD.
The majority of youth take medications from two or more categories, with the most common two category combination
being antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. Almost no child is taking more than one medication within a category. In
terms of specific medications, the most frequently prescribed medications are: Risperdol (27%), Abilify (20%), Seroquel
(20%), Catapres/Clonidine (18%) and Concerta (17%). Service Use
Children taking medications are significantly more likely to receive one or more of the following services: medication
monitoring (N=54), case management (N=53), family therapy (N=28), and crisis stabilization (N=16). We are looking at
differences in service constellations between children who take medications and those who do not. Next Steps
We presented these and other data related to medications at a recent research conference in Tampa. The Evaluation
Advisory Group was instrumental in helping us decipher the medication data in preparation for this presentation. We are
now exploring some other relationships with medications, such as:
• The effect of caregiver empowerment on medication and service use – for example, are children of empowered
caregivers more likely to use medications? More likely to engage in family therapy or other services?
• The effect of type of health insurance on medication use and service access.
• The effect of medications on housing stability and clinical outcomes.
• Side effects and their influence on medication compliance and quality of life.
If you are interested in joining the Evaluation Advisory Group to help us explore these and other questions, please contact LuAnn McCormick. Anyone is welcome to join – family members are particularly encouraged to come to help us put a real-life lens on the data we are collecting.
For more information on the Evaluation Program, please contact
LuAnn McCormick, PhD, MSW, Evaluation Team Leader
Families Together in Albany County (New York) 8)442-5731
Editorial Una perspectiva evolutiva y del desarrollo en el trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo: ¿de dónde viene y a dónde va la acumulación compulsiva? También resulta complicado ir a la cama cuando se tienen 2 años de edad… con fre-cuencia a la hora de acostarse se requiere una estructura rígida y compleja. Hay un ritualascendente, un ritual de cepillarse los dientes, meterse e
Name_________________________________________ Date of Birth__________________________________________ Street Address________________________________________________________________________________________ City, State, Zip________________________________________________________________________________________ Best Way to reach you________________________________________________________________